/faq
Tell me about yourself
I'm a senior full-stack engineer with a strong systems mindset and a focus on how things behave in the real world.
I learn by understanding how systems behave in the real world — how data flows, how state changes, and where assumptions break down. Rather than relying on memorisation of documentation or specific frameworks, I focus on first principles and context, which allows me to adapt quickly as tools, requirements, or constraints change.
I specialise in taking complex or fragile setups and shaping them into systems that are reliable, understandable, and resilient in day-to-day use. I work end-to-end, take ownership of outcomes, and care deeply about how things behave once they're live.
How do you learn and retain things?
By reasoning through real scenarios.
I learn best when I can observe a system directly — tracing behaviour, debugging failures, and seeing how it responds to change or load. This builds a mental model of how things actually work, not just how they're described.
Once I understand that model, the knowledge transfers easily across languages, frameworks, and architectures. The specifics may change, but the underlying principles remain the same.
What are you best at?
I tend to do my best work when I'm given space to understand a system properly and improve it thoughtfully.
- Understanding complex systems quickly
- Identifying hidden assumptions and edge cases
- Debugging issues that don't have obvious causes
- Choosing appropriate tools based on constraints, not trends
- Designing systems that remain stable as they evolve
- Reducing operational and cognitive overhead for teams
I'm particularly effective in environments where clarity matters more than flash.
How do you approach problem-solving?
I start by building a clear mental model of the system:
- what goes in
- what state exists
- how that state changes over time
- where uncertainty or failure can occur
Once that model is solid, decisions become much easier. This lets me move between technologies confidently, because I'm reasoning about behaviour and trade-offs rather than surface-level syntax.
What's your core tech stack?
Core
- Laravel
- Python
- TypeScript
- React / Next.js
AI & data
- LLMs (OpenAI, Anthropic)
- LangChain
- RAG pipelines
- Vector databases (Pinecone, Qdrant)
Infrastructure
- Supabase
- Docker
- CI/CD
- GitHub Actions
I'm not attached to tools. I'm attached to systems that work.
How do you use AI in production?
Carefully and intentionally.
I use AI where it removes manual work, helps with classification or retrieval, and supports humans instead of replacing judgment. That usually means RAG instead of free-form generation, with clear boundaries, fallbacks, and observable behaviour.
Most real systems work better with deterministic flows, explicit state, and AI used in narrow, well-defined steps. When I do build agent-like behaviour, it's interruptible, observable, scoped to a real task, and designed to fail safely.
If I can't explain what it's doing clearly, it doesn't ship.
How do you approach backend architecture?
I favour simple, deliberate designs with clear ownership and predictable behaviour.
Rather than optimising for novelty or theoretical elegance, I aim for systems that feel dependable in practice and are:
- easy to reason about
- difficult to misuse
- understandable by someone new to the codebase
If a system only makes sense after a long explanation, it's usually carrying unnecessary complexity.
Monoliths or microservices?
Monoliths by default.
I've seen too many teams add complexity before they have a real scaling problem. A well-structured monolith is usually faster to ship, easier to debug, and cheaper to run.
I reach for microservices only when reality forces the decision.
How do you test your work?
I test the parts that are expensive to get wrong.
That usually means:
- core logic
- system boundaries
- anything that's painful to debug in production
I care more about confidence than coverage percentages.
How do you handle legacy systems?
With respect.
Legacy systems usually exist because they once solved a real problem. I try to understand why before changing anything.
I prefer:
- isolating risk
- improving things incrementally
- leaving systems better than I found them
How do you work day-to-day?
I work in tight feedback loops:
- understand the real problem
- observe how the system actually behaves
- make the smallest change that meaningfully improves it
- ship
- learn from reality
I optimise for momentum and clarity, not perfection.
What does success look like in your first 30 days?
- I understand the system well enough to debug it confidently
- I've shipped at least one meaningful improvement
- I've identified risks others have learned to live with
- I'm trusted to work independently
What roles are you looking for?
- Backend-heavy or full-stack roles
- Teams shipping real products
- Environments where engineers own outcomes
- Permanent roles or long-term contracts
- Remote-first preferred
What kind of work do you avoid?
- Roles with no ownership
- AI work that exists only for demos or pitches
- Over-engineered systems without users
- Teams where production is rare or political
What motivates you?
- Solving real problems
- Debugging hard things
- Removing unnecessary complexity
- Shipping systems people rely on
I get energy from making things work properly.
Why should someone hire you?
Because I bring calm, clarity, and depth to complex problems.
I think carefully before acting, adapt quickly when circumstances change, and stay steady under pressure. I focus on building systems that hold up over time. I'm comfortable working independently, collaborating closely with others, and taking responsibility for outcomes.
I don't optimise for show — I optimise for systems that work reliably in the real world.
What's your availability?
Open to the right permanent role or long-term contract.
Not interested in short, low-ownership engagements.
What's your rate or salary range?
Shared privately once there's alignment on expectations and scope.
If price is the first conversation, we're probably not a fit.
Final note
If you value engineers who learn through reality, debug deeply, and ship systems that survive contact with users, we'll work well together.
How do I contact you?
Email: jake@nought.digital